Well folks we have not one but a double of articles here, which is very apt as its normally with a double rifle you take with you, to where? Well this article we are in Africa, in the bush on safari no less.
As some of you know the African Safari is now in the press for all the wrong reasons, from poor old Cecil the lion to Gerty the girrafe, it seems if your non hunting and used to be a bit of a celebrity you can jump on the band wagon of ” I dont know what I’m talking about but I’m back on TV.”
So we have the ever knowledgeable and highly respected hunter and firearms dealer, Mr Diggory Hadoke of Vintage guns.Here:
Now Neil along with his clients people like Diggory and maybe you one day, help in a bigger way, the eco system of Africa…Please remeber that the Uk our little island hold 65 million people. Africa has a current population of 1,288,214,586, yes that 1 billion !!!
Here is how they help !
The thrill of grassing a really old, gold-medal buck, every stalker must acknowledge, beats the quiet satisfaction of taking another cull buck.
The hunt aside, that set of antlers, I’ll make a bet with you, ﬁnds itself carefully prepared and mounted:either in the classic ‘European mount’ style or as a full head and cape mount, beﬁtting its status as an animal less ordinary. For many of us, for whom the stalking of four legged quarry is a passion, as well as a duty or a necessary part of our lives or jobs, the exceptional animal is something we mark.
‘Trophy Hunting’ in Africa and other parts of the world has developed something of a bad name in recent years. I very much doubt Countryman’s Diary readers are regular viewers of morning television, but those who might have stumbled upon some of my, often heated, discussions with Piers Morgan or Eamon Holmes on the subject will have noticed how opposed the mainstream media is to the notion of someone taking a riﬂe to a remote spot, in order to dispatch a rare or charismatic animal and furnish his all with the resultant trophy.
The standard tactic of the opposition is to fetish the kill. For them hunting is mere killing. They draw no distinction between the deer stalker and the slaughter-man, except the stalker, to them is to be more reviled as he does the killing not for a paycheck, but for the enjoyment of the act of killing.
This kind of reductionist argument de-contextualises the complexity of a hunter’s activities and motivations to absurdity, yet it enables opponents of hunting to de-humanise, indeed demonize, hunters, to the extent that they can be hated and persecuted with a level of vitriol normally reserved for child molesters or corrupt political figures.
However, the facts about the effects of properly managed trophy hunting (I prefer the term ‘sport hunting’, for the sport hunter hunts for the enjoyment of hunting, the trophy is a mere memento of the experience), show that by any dispassionate measure, it can, and does provide a secure future for wild populations of animals and their environment, as well as producing valued protein that sustains the local people in countries where protein is a scarce commodity.
Let us consider just two examples of African sport hunting operations which directly beneﬁt the local environment, the local fauna and the local people directly. Beneﬁts that without these activities, would disappear and not be replaced with anything.
The ﬁrst example to consider is the hunting of elephant in Botswana.
This is a particularly useful example as elephant hunting has since been banned in the country, under pressure from foreign organizations, some of which have threatened Botswana’s tourist and diamond industries with boycotts unless they comply with anti-hunting agendas.I attended an elephant hunt in the Okavango Delta in 2007.
The American client was there to hunt for one old bull. Now, as a trophy hunter, he had set himself a goal of trying to ﬁnd and shoot an elephant with bigger tusks than had shot before. Seeking an animal of this type provided him with a hunt. A true hunt. He was not there to just go up to the nearest elephant and shoot it; a large part of the attraction to the hunter is the quest.
Over three weeks, we tracked close to eighty elephants, sometimes never getting close, other times sneaking unseen to within a few yards of them. All this in thick scrub, with visibility in most places under ten yards. Time and again, we got to shooting distance, after hours of tracking, only to reject the bull as too young or too small. The whole process was a mixture of thrilling and terrifying, not to mention uncomfortable and exhausting.
The client shot his bull on day twelve of a sixteen day hunt. The tusks topped his old record of 66lbs, at 71lbs. The elephant was solitary, old and well past his prime. The shots from the double .470 were well placed and, much like a heart-shot deer, after a hundred-yard dash following impact, the animal lay lifeless in the sand. What followed was remarkable.
A whole village arrived twenty four hours later, and spent the next four days butchering the carcass. The tusks were removed, given a CITES number and prepared for export. The skin was removed for tanning. It makes excellent leather for boots or bags or furniture. The ﬂesh was removed in strips and hung on frames to dry into biltong. Meanwhile, the ﬁres burned and the people feasted on a rare commodity in Africa – protein. Eventually, the dried meat was removed and all that as left for the vultures, hyenas and marabou stalks was the gut pile and a few bones.
The hunt took out an elephant that was no longer any use to the gene pool, one who was destined to die of starvation in a few months or years, as his ﬁnal set of teeth wore out. It is generally accepted that elephant numbers in Botswana are grossly in excess of what the habitat can sustain. The alternative to trophy hunting, and the money it brings in is the shooting of elephants by government employees. This incurs a cost to the country, rather than providing income.
The hunting camp provided employment for local people. Trackers, skinners, cooks, mechanics, waitresses, cleaners, camp staff. In all, around twenty people, all from the area; people who would otherwise have no work, no income and nothing to do. What do they do when these opportunities are not forthcoming? They poach for the pot, for the illegal bush-meat trade or for the crime syndicates that pay for elephant tusks, lion bones, rhino horn.
The bird-shooting activities I have participated in have similar local beneﬁts in South Africa, where the sun-ﬂower seed crop is crippled annually by losing 30% of yield to pigeons and guinea fowl. The teams of hunters who visit the Free State to seek the sporting opportunities these birds provide, bring with them much-needed foreign currency, which they spend locally.
However, the beneﬁts go beyond mere expenditure.In the areas we shoot, we have convinced the farmers that, not only will we pay them for the permission to shoot on their land, but that our efforts reduce the populations sufficiently to stop them from ﬂying over the roost with crop dusters and poisoning everything they pass. It was heartbreaking to walk through coppices littered with poisoned and rotting guinea fowl, as well as hundreds of tiny song birds, which are also killed during these operations.
By sustainability hunting problem species, we help the farmers and provide the incentive for them to be more ethical in their management of the environment. The pigeons and guinea fowl themselves, go straight into the food chain.
At the end of every day, the ‘bird boys’ we employ to collect every shot bird, have sacks full of fresh meat. They are driven to the townships, where poverty levels are most acute, and distribute the smaller birds, free of charge to the children, who often cook and eat them on the spot The larger birds are much in demand and form a useful bonus income for the locals with whom we work. Nothing is wasted.
In areas where trophy hunting is the management tool of choice, the view from the air tells the story. Hunting concessions are lush and green, whereas the surrounding lands, ravaged by cattle farming, are brown, dry and barren. As hunting is closed due to external pressure groups and their misguided efforts, more land is encroached,
the wild animals, seen as. competing for the valuable grazing, or as predators threatening cattle herds, are systematically and quickly decimated. That is the fate that awaits what is left of wild Africa, as human populations increase and the wild areas face ever more pressure.
Only hunting concessions provide the locals with a reason not to kill everything, as they give a monetary value to the preservation of the ﬂora and fauna, Without sustainable, ethical sport or trophy hunting.
Africa’s Wildlife has no Future.
Hunt Against Hunger – A Program that Works
Colonel David A. Nuss
Professional Staff Member
NB Safaris, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Creative and compassionate; aptly describes Neil Barnard, Owner/Outfitter of NB Safaris, one of the most successful hunting safari lodges in South Africa. An endless bundle of energy, Neil believes in creatively and encourages staff to continually think outside the box. And so it was when asked to contribute meat from trophy hunted animals to a local feeding program, administered by Blessman International Ministries, for nutritionally-at-risk children.
Before going further into the program, it is necessary to first understand the cohort from which these children come and the causes thereof. Consider that there are 11 million people undernourished in developed countries. Children in the program are primarily “AIDS Orphans.” They have lost parents due to AIDS and live with relatives who cannot afford to provide all of their needs. AIDS is especially prevalent in southern Africa (Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe, where approximately six million people are estimated to live with the condition (as reported by Elise L. Riley).
The children in the program have not been hungry as usually envisioned. Rather, they have been malnourished, subsisting, for the most part, on a diet of corn meal which is lacking in essential proteins. This leads to protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). It is basically a lack of calories and protein. Food is converted into energy by humans, and the energy contained in food is measured by calories. Protein is necessary for key body functions including provision of essential amino acids for maintenance of muscles. Protein-energy malnutrition is the more lethal form of malnutrition/hunger and is the type of malnutrition that is referred to when world hunger is discussed. This leads to growth failure. Principal types of growth failure are wasting or nutritional oedema and stunting. Eight ounces of red meat per week is effective in preventing PEM.
Now, instead of a one time or occasional donation of meat, Neil reasoned that with 137 hunters visiting NB Safaris this year, why not offer the clients an opportunity to donate the meat from their trophies to Blessman. This would ensure enough meat for each child (110 in the program) to have a nice serving each day.
Here’s how the program works. Clients are given information on the program before coming to Africa. They can sign up with NB Safaris. NB Safaris notifies Blessman headquarters, a 501c(3) charity headquartered in Iowa. NB Safaris butchers the meat into stew-size pieces. Blessman’s local staff pick up the meat. NB Safaris reports the weight of meat donated by the individual client. Blessman’s headquarters sends the client a receipt for donation in the amount of the retail price of the meat. Everyone benefits: Blessman has a steady supply of fresh meat and the hunters get a tax deduction for coming on a hunting safari. As a bonus, hunting clients who have filled their trophy list are afforded the opportunity to visit Blessman’s facility and take part in serving the meals.
Other facets of Blessman’s ministry include computer skills and academic tutoring. There is a active gardening program, the harvest of which is served to the children. The children are well mannered and enjoy meeting the client hunters.
There are far reaching possibilities for similar ventures between hunting safari lodges and ministries. South Africa, alone, has over 22 million head of wild game, most of which is owned and controlled by outfitters. What is amazing is that in 1963 there were only 190,000 head of wild game.
The demands of the hunting safari industry have resulted in the restoration of game stocks and the bringing back from near extinction several species, e.g., black wildebeest. NB Safaris and Blessman are planning to extend the program to a hunting concession in Mozambique. Neil Barnard has truly created an ideal program: it is privately run, does not require government interference, is effective, and gives donors a tax break. For further information Google the NB Safaris web site.
Neil Barnard +27 83 391 1646
Outfitter for NBSAFARIS